Canadian Medical Tourism
Canada’s public health care system promises universal coverage, but it does not guarantee universal access on a universal schedule. Long wait times force some Canadians living in pain to go out of country rather than wait 6 months to a year and a half for surgery for non-life-threatening conditions.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Senate Finance Panel Passes Health Reform (cbsnews.com)
- Caplan Canvasses the Globe for Lessons on Health Care (bioethics.net)
- Baucus Health Care Bill: In a Word, Awful (campaignsilo.firedoglake.com)
- Daily Pulse: All Eyes on the Senate Finance Committee (politicalwire.com)
- The Max Tax: Baucus Plan Fails to Control Growth of Insurance Premiums (campaignsilo.firedoglake.com)
- Wednesday Morning Open Thread (americablog.com)
- Anti-Reform Group Plans Local TV Ads Where Obama Is Vacationing (huffingtonpost.com)
- Making Congress Go Uninsured (kristof.blogs.nytimes.com)
- Letter from India: The State Is Bad News for Health Care (nytimes.com)
- Let Congress go without health insurance (rebeccablood.net)
Share this:
Read also:
- Medical Tourism featuring Planet Hospital
- Medical Tourism @ CHRISTUS Muguerza (Monterrey, Mexico)
- Cosmetic Surgery - Med Journeys - Linda Deebs - Medical Tourism India
- medical tourism india
- Medical Tourism in Taiwan
- Incentives to boost medical tourism
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=89d28909-3b0d-46a3-9a88-85d440299541)
October 13th, 2009 at 6:52 am
Really?
Amazing- my sister is a nurse in London, Ontario. She tells me of the great benefits of the Canadian system. I’ll talk to her and have her comment on this clip.
October 13th, 2009 at 11:45 pm
Please elaborate on what she has told you.. Define great benefits please, I am really trying to find out what they might be.
October 14th, 2009 at 12:03 am
Another useless attempt by a worthless GOP Research Center to scare the American public. It won’t work. Americans are much smarter then you realize. Republican campaigns are funded largely by insurance companies so this is ‘just business’ for them but to the 46 million Americans without insurance it is about quality of life. This is a system to help them. Healthcare reform will not hurt those insured by private insurers it will help those without any insurance. Cheers to OBAMA!
October 14th, 2009 at 2:49 am
Perhaps the Canadian approach works so well for so many in that country is that the system is set up to treat common, minor problems and ignore the rest so that the patients go to the U.S. for the more expensive, complicated treatments.
Sounds like a low-cost, efficient system that gets it 90% right… as long as treatment is limited to flu shots and prescribing aspirin.
October 14th, 2009 at 3:55 am
I’m trying to find what “great benefits” there are too. All I hear is about the long waits for what they consider “elective” surgery. Really? I think walking isn’t an elective. What about the quality of life?